* Names have been changed. Our thanks to the individuals who gave us permission to share their story to help others.
Paula is employed on a job-share basis. Whilst on maternity leave her employer advertised a post that seemed to replace her role.
Restructuring took place which resulted in her post having less responsibility, while Paula’s job share colleague would have increased hours with greater responsibility. At no time was Paula approached or consulted about the restructuring and she had no opportunity to apply for the new role as the recruitment process was carried out during her maternity leave. Paula had made a complaint through the grievance procedure.
Full and Final Settlement
At the mediation meeting the employer agreed to that the new post would not affect Paula’s job role, status, responsibilities or job description. The employer also provided an assurance of equal pay between the two restructured posts.
The parties discussed that any perception of changes to Paula’s role and to responsibilities would be addressed to ensure that other employees had an accurate understanding of the outcome of the mediation meeting.
It was agreed that the finding of the grievance procedure and the grievance itself would be formally withdrawn and made void.
A sum of £4,000 was awarded to Paula as a ‘without prejudice’ payment.